Donald Trump did not take the stand in his hush money trial, as jurors could start deliberating on whether or not he is guilty next week.
Mr Trump, 77, is accused of falsifying business records over hush money payments to the porn star Stormy Daniels in the lead-up to his 2016 presidential campaign.
But on day 20 of the trial, the former president’s defence rested without calling him to the stand. Instead, former federal prosecutor Robert Costello was called as the final witness.
Follow latest: Defence rests case without calling Trump
Judge Juan Merchan said he expects closing arguments to happen on 28 May. Jurors have been dismissed until then, and could begin deliberating as soon as next week to decide whether or not Trump is guilty.
Ever since the outset of the trial in April, Trump had asserted he would testify in his own defence despite it being uncommon for defendants to do so.
The former president also falsely claimed a gag order placed on him by judge Merchan prevented him from speaking in court.
Donald Trump trial judge Juan Merchan scolds defence witness for giving him ‘side-eye’
Adam Boulton: ‘Like those old guys on The Muppets’ – bad sign for democracy as Trump and Biden call shots on how they will debate
Donald Trump trial star witness Michael Cohen accused of lying about hush money phone call
‘We’ll be resting pretty quickly’
Sky News’ US correspondent James Matthews also heard Trump tell reporters ahead of Tuesday’s proceedings: “We’ll be resting pretty quickly. I won’t be resting.
“I don’t rest, I’d like to rest sometimes but I don’t get to rest.”
US correspondent
Looking at the timetable, we could have a verdict by the end of next week. With the prosecution and defence having rested, the court has begun to contemplate the case’s conclusion.
Tuesday has seen discussions over the instructions the judge will give the jury when its 12 members are sent to consider a verdict.
Prosecutors brought this case to court as the deliberate falsification of business records, a misdemeanour. That’s elevated to a felony if they can prove it was an act intended to conceal information from voters that could have impacted on his chances at the 2016 election.
The exact crime in question will crystallise in discussions between the judge, prosecution, and defence. A three-way courtroom conference will shape the instructions given to the jury, a last job for the judge next week before he sends them to deliberate.
It is the business of criminal prosecution, the nuts and bolts of American justice that underpin this process. As things stand, closing arguments (summations) could begin next Tuesday, with the jury being sent out soon after.
Witness-wise, it was deprived of a big finish when Donald Trump declined to give testimony, as he had said he would.
“We’ll be resting pretty quickly,” he said. “I won’t be resting. I don’t rest. I’d like to rest sometimes, but I don’t get to rest.”
It was a statement for the cameras in the court building corridor. The rest is history, like everything else in this most significant trial.
The prosecution alleges the former president tried to cover up a $130,000 payment to Ms Daniels, who told the court she had a “sexual encounter” with Trump at a celebrity golf outing in Lake Tahoe in July 2006.
Though the hush money payment itself is not illegal, the former president faces 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide his reimbursement to his former lawyer Michael Cohen, who initially paid for the transaction.
Cohen testified that a number of invoices, cheques and stubs were false records made to cover payments to Ms Daniels, and said none of them were for work carried out in the months to which they corresponded.
Trump has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers say there was nothing criminal about the Daniels deal or the way Cohen was paid.
Cohen lied under oath
The former president’s defence have also attempted to discredit Mr Cohen, who admitted during the trial that he lied under oath.
Defence lawyer Todd Blanche said on Monday: “There is no way that the court should let this case go to the jury relying on Cohen’s testimony.”
Read more on Sky News:
Johansson ‘angered’ by alleged OpenAI voice mimic
Elvis’ granddaughter fights Graceland auction
US embassy refuses to pay £14.6m TfL bill
Trump’s lawyers also moved to have judge Merchan dismiss the case before jury deliberations, arguing there was no evidence that Trump had committed the crimes.
The judge did not immediately rule on the request by the defence.
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
And speaking outside the courtroom after the defence rested, Donald Trump Jr defended his father’s choice to not testify and repeated claims that the trial is politically motivated.
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
“Why would you justify this insanity? You don’t subject yourself to that. You’re going in a kangaroo court, nothing more nothing less,” he said.
“There’s absolutely no reason or justification to do that whatsoever. Everyone sees it for the sham that it is.”
