• Coins MarketCap
    • Coins MarketCap
    • Crypto Calculator
    • Top Gainers and Loser of the day
  • Crypto Exchanges
  • Bitcoin News
  • Crypto News
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Blockchain
    • Finance
    • Investing
    • View all latest Updates regarding crypto
Thursday, December 4, 2025
WIREOPEDIA
No Result
View All Result
Contribute!
CONTACT US
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • World
  • UK
  • US
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Defense
  • Health Care
  • Politics
  • Strange
  • Crypto News
WIREOPEDIA
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • World
  • UK
  • US
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Defense
  • Health Care
  • Politics
  • Strange
  • Crypto News
No Result
View All Result
WIREOPEDIA
No Result
View All Result
Home Technology

Porn provider fined £1m by Ofcom as impact of new online safety rules revealed

by wireopedia memeber
December 4, 2025
in Technology
0
Porn provider fined £1m by Ofcom as impact of new online safety rules revealed
74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Ofcom has fined a pornography provider £1m for not having robust age checks.

You might also like

Hundreds of UK moderators have left TikTok – sparking safety fears, whistleblowers reveal

Weight loss jabs backed to tackle obesity by WHO

Bigger than COVID? The graph that explains why AI is going to be so huge

AVS, which runs 18 adult websites, was also fined £50,000 for not responding to information requests from the communications regulator.

Since July, websites and apps that host adult content have had to have age verification checks in place to stop young people from seeing their content.

Days after those rules came into force, Ofcom began investigating websites that hadn’t properly complied, including AVS sites, which have millions of monthly UK users, according to the regulator.

AVS has 72 hours to introduce “highly effective” age verification or it will be fined £1,000 a day until it does.

“They said that they had age checks in place, but they just weren’t good enough,” said Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom’s online safety group director to Sky News’ Sophy Ridge and Wilf Frost on Thursday morning.

“They didn’t have liveness checks, so you could hold up a photograph of somebody else and that would get you through. But that’s obviously just not good enough.”

This is the third company Ofcom has fined since the new rules came into place. The forum 4chan was the first; it was fined £20,000 in October.

The fines came as Ofcom released new data about the impact of their new online safety rules.

Almost half – 47% – of children aged eight to 17 encountered an age check online when trying to access age-restricted content after the July deadline compared to 30% before, according to the new report.

Read more tech news:
UK moderators lave TikTok, whistleblowers reveal
Australia’s under 16s social media ban: How will it work?
Spotify Wrapped: Who are this year’s top artists?

More than half – 58% – of parents believe the measures are already improving the safety of UK children online, while 36% noticed a potential impact on their child’s online activity, according to the regulator’s statistics.

The new rules proved controversial, however.

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

Some say the age verification checks are too easy to bypass, while others argue they are a security risk, as users usually have to upload a picture of their face to a third-party website.

The technology secretary Liz Kendall said Ofcom has the government’s “full backing” to use all of its powers in enforcing the rules.

“Since the enforcement of the Online Safety Act, platforms have finally started taking responsibility for protecting children and removing illegal and hateful content,” she said.

Read Entire Article
Tags: SkynewsTechnology
Share30Tweet19

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

What Bitcoin CME gaps are and how they influence price movements

What Bitcoin CME gaps are and how they influence price movements

November 25, 2025
Pictured: Tenerife property where missing Jay Slater was last seen

Pictured: Tenerife property where missing Jay Slater was last seen

June 20, 2024
What is quantitative easing, and how does it work?

What is quantitative easing, and how does it work?

April 24, 2025

Browse by Category

  • Blockchain
  • Breaking News
  • Business
  • Crypto
  • Crypto Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Defense
  • Entertainment
  • Finance
  • Health Care
  • Investing
  • Market
  • Politics
  • Strange
  • Technology
  • UK News
  • US News
  • World
WIREOPEDIA

Wireopedia is an automated news feed. The Wireopedia AI pulls from sources with different views so you can see the various sides of different arguments and make a decision for yourself. Wireopedia will be firmly committed to the public interest and democratic values.

Privacy Policy     Terms and Conditions

CATEGORIES

  • Blockchain
  • Breaking News
  • Business
  • Crypto
  • Crypto Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Defense
  • Entertainment
  • Finance
  • Health Care
  • Investing
  • Market
  • Politics
  • Strange
  • Technology
  • UK News
  • US News
  • World

BROWSE BY TAG

Bitcoin Bitcoinist Bitcoinmagazine Blockchain Breaking News Business BuzzFeed Celebrity News Coin Surges Cointelegraph Cryptocurrencies Cryptoslate Defense Entertainment Health Care insidebitcoins Market Stories newsbtc Politico Skynews Strange Technology Trading UK US World

RECENT POSTS

  • Porn provider fined £1m by Ofcom as impact of new online safety rules revealed
  • Police to ramp up use of ‘out-of-control’ facial recognition tech
  • Number of flu patients in hospital beds across England rises by more than 50%
  • Can Hegseth’s MAGA playbook spare him again?
  • Dragons Den record-breaker yuv styles £9m funding round

© 2024 WIREOPEDIA - All right reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • World
  • UK
  • US
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Defense
  • Health Care
  • Politics
  • Strange
  • Crypto News
  • Contribute!

© 2024 WIREOPEDIA - All right reserved.

  • bitcoinBitcoin(BTC)$93,245.000.30%
  • ethereumEthereum(ETH)$3,189.154.27%
  • tetherTether(USDT)$1.00-0.01%
  • rippleXRP(XRP)$2.16-0.78%
  • binancecoinBNB(BNB)$909.841.40%
  • solanaSolana(SOL)$143.431.32%
  • usd-coinUSDC(USDC)$1.00-0.01%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether(STETH)$3,187.404.41%
  • tronTRON(TRX)$0.2805160.42%
  • dogecoinDogecoin(DOGE)$0.149606-0.07%
  • cardanoCardano(ADA)$0.4462281.71%
  • wrapped-bitcoinWrapped Bitcoin(WBTC)$93,131.000.30%
  • bitcoin-cashBitcoin Cash(BCH)$578.43-1.28%
  • chainlinkChainlink(LINK)$14.510.82%
  • stellarStellar(XLM)$0.254223-1.22%
  • litecoinLitecoin(LTC)$84.62-0.64%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche(AVAX)$14.734.67%
  • shiba-inuShiba Inu(SHIB)$0.000009-0.41%
  • daiDai(DAI)$1.00-0.03%
  • crypto-com-chainCronos(CRO)$0.109155-1.47%
  • polkadotPolkadot(DOT)$2.331.31%
  • uniswapUniswap(UNI)$6.060.57%
  • nearNEAR Protocol(NEAR)$1.884.34%
  • okbOKB(OKB)$106.710.82%
  • algorandAlgorand(ALGO)$0.1406580.95%
  • filecoinFilecoin(FIL)$1.602.62%
  • vechainVeChain(VET)$0.0134180.58%
  • cosmosCosmos Hub(ATOM)$2.36-0.35%